When Convenience Replaces Covenant
- Nehemiah Drook

- Dec 29, 2025
- 3 min read
We don’t talk enough about how technology shapes desire.
We talk about productivity, efficiency, and intelligence, but rarely about appetite. Yet Scripture has always treated desire as one of the most powerful forces in human life. What we long for shapes what we build. What we indulge shapes what we become.
AI is about to intensify this in ways we’re not prepared for.
Humanity is already experiencing a collapse in fertility rates across much of the developed world. This didn’t begin with AI. It began with comfort, convenience, and the gradual separation of pleasure from responsibility. AI doesn’t create that trend. It accelerates it.
For the first time in history, we are approaching a world where companionship, affirmation, and even simulated intimacy can be delivered without relationship, sacrifice, or commitment. When desire can be met without responsibility, the incentives to pursue real covenant relationships weaken.
That matters, because fertility is downstream from commitment.
Children are born into stable futures when men and women choose responsibility over convenience, covenant over consumption. When those foundations erode, birth rates follow. This is not speculation. We’re already seeing it play out across cultures saturated with digital gratification.
AI doesn’t just personalize information. It personalizes experience. It learns what appeals to us and adapts accordingly. And if those systems are built for profit, they will inevitably lean toward what keeps users engaged, not what forms them toward self-control, faithfulness, or sacrificial love.
Scripture has always warned that unchecked desire distorts both the individual and society. Lust isn’t condemned because pleasure is evil, but because desire detached from purpose consumes rather than creates. It takes without giving life in return.
The Bible ties this directly to wisdom. When desire is trained toward self-gratification, it becomes harder to choose patience, fidelity, and long-term responsibility. Over time, the habits of indulgence reshape culture itself.
This is where AI becomes uniquely dangerous, not because it introduces temptation, but because it removes friction. It makes indulgence easier, more private, more personalized, and more constant. And when temptation becomes effortless, resistance requires far more intentionality than most people are prepared for.
The result isn’t just individual moral failure. It’s demographic collapse.
Fewer marriages. Fewer children. Fewer people willing to invest in the future because the present has been optimized to satisfy immediately. A society oriented around consumption will always struggle to sustain creation.
From a Christian perspective, this strikes at the heart of what humans were made for. We are not just consumers of pleasure. We are called by God to be fruitful and multiply, families, and future generations. Anything that trains desire away from that calling doesn’t just affect private morality. It affects the survival of cultures.
AI will not force people into this outcome. But it will make it easier to drift there without noticing. When desire is constantly fed and rarely challenged, responsibility starts to feel optional. And when responsibility feels optional, creation suffers.
Scripture reminds us that self-control is not repression. It is freedom. Freedom to choose love over impulse, covenant over convenience, and life over simulation.
The question, then, isn’t whether AI will enable destructive expressions of desire. It’s whether we will recognize that desire itself is being discipled.
Fertility rates don’t collapse overnight. They collapse when a culture slowly forgets why future generations matter.
If AI shapes desire without restraint, it won’t just change how people live. It will change whether societies continue at all.
And that’s a cost far greater than any technological gain.


Comments